Use cases
Same waste,
different shape
A 150-person company and a 15,000-person company both pay for seats nobody uses. They just get there by completely different routes.
Scaling company
100–250 staff
Today
You grew fast, everyone bought what they needed, and now nobody has the full list of what the company pays for.
With Ghostseats
One list, one owner per tool, and a renewal calendar that exists for the first time.
Mid-market
250–1,000 staff
Today
Departments buy their own tools. Finance sees the total at renewal and has no way to challenge any of it.
With Ghostseats
Spend attributed to the department that owns it, with duplicate tools surfaced before they renew.
Large organisation
1,000–5,000 staff
Today
Hundreds of tools across several business units, and procurement will not cut anything without evidence.
With Ghostseats
Login-level evidence for every proposed cut, routed through your own approval workflow.
Multinational
5,000+ staff
Today
Several entities, several currencies, and a software bill that nobody can see end to end.
With Ghostseats
One rollup across entities and currencies, with the exchange-rate effect shown separately.
Who it touches
One bill,
six departments
This is why nobody has fixed it already. Everyone can see a piece of the problem and nobody can see all of it.
01
Finance
Sees the total, but not what any of it buys.
02
IT
Knows the tools, but not what each seat costs.
03
Procurement
Needs evidence before it will cut a contract.
04
Department heads
Bought the tool, and forgot they still pay for it.
05
Security
Wants dormant accounts closed, not just unpaid.
06
The exec team
Approves the budget without seeing the waste inside it.
Which one
are you?
Tell us your shape and we will show you where the waste usually hides in a company built like yours.